
Pages
▼
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Susan's Frustration

7 comments:
Thanks so much for visiting my blog and taking the time to leave a comment!
I will reply to all comments with a link or email address. If you are a Google+ user or do not have your email enabled in your Blogger account I can not reach you to reply.
If you have a question and would like to email me directly there is a link in the sidebar and another email link in my profile.
That is too bad, Susan. Snoodle http://jeanqueen666.blogspot.com/
ReplyDeleteposted about a problem with the software also. Looks like it came out well in the end. These blocks look so complicated to be so small.
thanks for the heads up...I too have on occassion found mistakes in patterns. You are right to warn readers to make sure of the pattern before starting to cut
ReplyDeleteI'm working from the book and have come across two blocks, so far, that Brenda has altered from the original. I caught the first one before I made it, but pieced the second one before I realized she changed it.
ReplyDeleteI agree..both the book and the software desperately need a version 2.0!
ReplyDeleteInteresting observation from both you and Anya. Do you think the designer of the software and book are aware of the errors? It is good that you and Anya are both seasoned quilters or that could be very discouraging to deal with the errors! Perhaps some have become frustrated and pushed the whole DJ project to the side...to become another UFO!
ReplyDeleteCarol Miller teaches a class at Quilt University called "Jane Must Be Crazy!" She has adapted the Dear Jane blocks to more standard sizes. I think purists won't go for it, but for people who like the look and want to keep their sanity, it's a good idea. It must really be frustrating to use software that has errors.
ReplyDeleteOh that is so frustrating! I had a little trip into template from a book piecing at Christmas, but got very frustrated with one which when the pizza slices were sewn together, were more than 360c circle. I ended up fiddling around so it wouldn't look like a rolling sea.
ReplyDeleteGood on you for telling others about this flaw.